Theses statement and 3 topic sentences

Abdulrahman



Theses Statement: Even though using technology in classroom helps students by accessing into education material, teachers should not allow to use cellphones and laptops inside classroom because banning electronic devices helps students to concentrate in lecture, taking notes in paper by writing with hands is better to remember than taking electronic notes, and prohibition electronic prevents student's distraction to occur during class.  

1- The first reason why teachers should not allow using technology devices in classrooms is banning these devices helps students to concentrate in lecture. 

2- Secondly, because of taking notes in paper by writing with hands is better to remember than taking electronic notes, students should not be allowed to use their laptops and tablets inside classrooms. 

3- The last reason why students should not be allowed to use technology in classrooms is prohibition electronic prevents student's distraction to occur during class.  

Annotated

Abdulrahman

         
            Today, there is argument among people whether they should make PEDs ban in sport or not. Competitive sport should not allow to use PEDs in order to every player has same chance as other players. As Goodman (2012) says,"competitive sport need to be fair between participant". This shows the using of PEDs gives some player, who use it in sport, more chance than other players. However, players will going to use other kind of drugs which can't detected by test. As Savulescu states, "the ban is bad for the health of athlete, they use undetectable substances and method with no medical supervision". This means the prohibition of PEDs cause several problems to players' health. People should think carefully about this issue and try to resolve it to avoid the negative effect of PEDs.

        These two articles is trusted and can be used in essay because they are current discussion, and the last update was 2012. Moreover, the writers are specialist in same issue's topic. In addition, these two articles are posted in New York Times Online. That is mean we can check for updates. Finally, the main point for these two article to inform and show the argument between people in using PEDs.



References 

Goodman, Margaret. (Aug 8, 2012). Clean competition is safe. Room for Debate: New York Times Online. Retrieved Aug 13, 2017.

Savulescu, Julian. (Aug 7, 2012). Permit doping so we can monitor it. Room for Debate. New York Times Online. Retrieved Aug 13, 2017.

Abdulrahman        

                Changing life style to be in low slandered is a big challenge for anyone. Many people have an experience with this situation.  The expatriates struggle to live in the new life because their daily habits change in many ways. First of all, they waste their time all day in order to weak infrastructure and the crawdad people in public transportation. For example, The time to reach any destination in the poor country is more than high class country as a double at least. The second suffering that people facing when changing live style to lower class is the dirt in public places. For instance, when someone wants to use restroom in that country, he has to find the clean one as a needle in a haystack. Finely, the internet service is very weak. That cause any websites take too long time to download. However, this hardship time teach the experiencing how to increase their durability and manage stress. To sum up, There is a hard time to strive in low class, but it keeps people stronger than before.

Thesis and 3 topics sentences

Thesis : Family structure, dining etiquette and holidays have distinction between Saudi Arabia and China.


First topic sentence: The first characteristic and major difference between Saudis and Chinese is family structure.

Second topic sentence: Another difference between theses two countries locate in dining room; specifically, dining etiquette.

Third topic sentence:The last one is Holidays which are different too between Saudi Arabia and China.

Abdulrahman

             All government should help environmental refugees who have been shifted to another country in order to be in safe place. Natural disaster in the world increase the number of the environmental refugees. As Handwerk (2004) explains, " Melting ice can also mean high sea levels" (para.7). This demonstrates many Islands and cities are under flooding risk in the future. Regrettably, the environmental refugees lost every things, and they don't have money too. This means  they need help to live in a well way, or to return to their home town, " more than 90 percent of the Korail slum's residents never leave because they can not save enough money to move"(KaKissis, 2010, para. 22). Some countries does not help environmental refugees in order to decrease the crime level; such as, theft and fights. Even thought the countries may have issues with refugees, government have to help them to avoid a humanitarian catastrophe. To sum up, all countries should assist the environmental refugees who do not choose this situation by them self.  

Abdulrahman

Summary of Environmental Refugees Unable to Return Home 

        In the article Environmental Refugees Unable to Return Home by Joanna Kakissis, the writer describes the changing in weather to be bad condition which case environmental refugees. Specifically, she says over tens millions of citizens in poor countries are under risk to move because of calamities. The environmental refugees shifts to major cities and tax exchequer. The author points out that the shifts to Dhaka the capital of Bangladesh have become constant, also it's poor neighborhood are weak to global warming. In addition, a large number of the environmental refugees stay in risky slums. Then, Kakissis goes on writing with personal experiences. The people are hope to help by International Organization. Finally, the environmental refugees wish to return to their hometown but they don't have enough money. 

Response of Innovations for Developing World

Abdulrahman

Response of Innovations for Developing World

             One point that the author mentions is helping poor countries to get necessary life requirements. I agree with the writer when he said there are lack of electricity and clean water in developing world. I think it is useful when the generator use cow dung in that countries. Also, a simple light bulb would change their lifestyle. Using vaporizing in order to get clean water is the best way to use in development world. These two ways are economical methods to solve these problems.  I recommend increase the number of machines to get more jobs too.